<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gay Marriage in Maryland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://harfordrepublican.com/gay-marriage-in-maryland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://harfordrepublican.com/gay-marriage-in-maryland/</link>
	<description>Harford County&#039;s Premier Political Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Cook</title>
		<link>http://harfordrepublican.com/gay-marriage-in-maryland/comment-page-1/#comment-2375</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harfordrepublican.com/?p=170#comment-2375</guid>
		<description>A new biblical discovery about the Iraq war shows insermountable evidence that &quot;the eagle &quot;America is to free Iraq in the latter days in prophecy after the towers fell and there was great slaughter. Listen to a recent critic who just read this new published discovery. 
Reading this particular book has made me aware of how christians have come to accept biblical spin and less than honest interpretations when reading books on Bible prophecy.  When I started reading &quot;Bible prophecies of 9 - 11&quot; the whole idea of 9 - 11 and Iraq being in Bible prophecy admittedly was quite appealing to me. 
 
 But it seemed very far fetched and I fully expected to discover another fiction story cleverly masked behind a another &quot;new&quot; biblical declaration.  I fully expected to see the familiar hand picking of quotes deliberately coming from the authors’ selection of unrelated texts to manipulate the meaning of Bible text.  I&#039;ve learned that it is a common trick to cleverly combine unrelated verses from separated biblical context in order to stretch readers’ perception beyond the original focus toward the authors’ conclusions, creating the appearance that authors conclusions are also supported by the Bible. 
 
 My first surprise while reading this book was to see this author approach things quite differently by laying a biblical foundation from Adam and Eve with the tree of life story, establishing common threads for his entire biblical claim.  As the first chapters began to build solidly on biblical themes I quickly realized this particular author was either seriously attempting to link legitimate patterns of bible prophecy, or he was using an even more clever deception to mislead me.  This author surprisingly understood the procedure to outline proper types and shadows and stay within one context while linking proper biblical themes.  Since the author was not spinning I suspected that he would postpone taking of his liberties until he would be forced into a corner having to demonstrate 9 - 11 towers falling and eagle&#039;s wings into modern Iraq.


To my surprise the transition was smooth and never broke context or prophetic flow.  Not only was 9 - 11 coming straight from the Bible but almost every highly specific detail, including the number of planes that hit each target, was referenced in the Bible with numerous exact details specifically related to 9 - 11.  This book does not just stop there, but continued to unwind the scenario of America going to Iraq spelling out the exact manner of Saddam’s capture and execution. This was a highly unusual book!  This book was based on what was written in the Bible and relied solely upon that premise.  How do I react to this other than try to convince someone to read it and find out?  I feel concerned that christians are so used to being tricked by each cry of wolf that when the real thing appears there will be a little comprehension that something amazing has occurred.  I have wracked my mind as to how this could have possibly been fixed and there is no possible way other than Gods prophets deliberately sent us this intentional message about Iraq and 9 - 11. Ross David    see book. www.eternaltruth.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new biblical discovery about the Iraq war shows insermountable evidence that &#8220;the eagle &#8220;America is to free Iraq in the latter days in prophecy after the towers fell and there was great slaughter. Listen to a recent critic who just read this new published discovery.<br />
Reading this particular book has made me aware of how christians have come to accept biblical spin and less than honest interpretations when reading books on Bible prophecy.  When I started reading &#8220;Bible prophecies of 9 &#8211; 11&#8243; the whole idea of 9 &#8211; 11 and Iraq being in Bible prophecy admittedly was quite appealing to me. </p>
<p> But it seemed very far fetched and I fully expected to discover another fiction story cleverly masked behind a another &#8220;new&#8221; biblical declaration.  I fully expected to see the familiar hand picking of quotes deliberately coming from the authors’ selection of unrelated texts to manipulate the meaning of Bible text.  I&#8217;ve learned that it is a common trick to cleverly combine unrelated verses from separated biblical context in order to stretch readers’ perception beyond the original focus toward the authors’ conclusions, creating the appearance that authors conclusions are also supported by the Bible. </p>
<p> My first surprise while reading this book was to see this author approach things quite differently by laying a biblical foundation from Adam and Eve with the tree of life story, establishing common threads for his entire biblical claim.  As the first chapters began to build solidly on biblical themes I quickly realized this particular author was either seriously attempting to link legitimate patterns of bible prophecy, or he was using an even more clever deception to mislead me.  This author surprisingly understood the procedure to outline proper types and shadows and stay within one context while linking proper biblical themes.  Since the author was not spinning I suspected that he would postpone taking of his liberties until he would be forced into a corner having to demonstrate 9 &#8211; 11 towers falling and eagle&#8217;s wings into modern Iraq.</p>
<p>To my surprise the transition was smooth and never broke context or prophetic flow.  Not only was 9 &#8211; 11 coming straight from the Bible but almost every highly specific detail, including the number of planes that hit each target, was referenced in the Bible with numerous exact details specifically related to 9 &#8211; 11.  This book does not just stop there, but continued to unwind the scenario of America going to Iraq spelling out the exact manner of Saddam’s capture and execution. This was a highly unusual book!  This book was based on what was written in the Bible and relied solely upon that premise.  How do I react to this other than try to convince someone to read it and find out?  I feel concerned that christians are so used to being tricked by each cry of wolf that when the real thing appears there will be a little comprehension that something amazing has occurred.  I have wracked my mind as to how this could have possibly been fixed and there is no possible way other than Gods prophets deliberately sent us this intentional message about Iraq and 9 &#8211; 11. Ross David    see book. <a href="http://www.eternaltruth.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.eternaltruth.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: independent educator</title>
		<link>http://harfordrepublican.com/gay-marriage-in-maryland/comment-page-1/#comment-2066</link>
		<dc:creator>independent educator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harfordrepublican.com/?p=170#comment-2066</guid>
		<description>Well said, Bull!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Bull!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BullElephant</title>
		<link>http://harfordrepublican.com/gay-marriage-in-maryland/comment-page-1/#comment-2065</link>
		<dc:creator>BullElephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harfordrepublican.com/?p=170#comment-2065</guid>
		<description>Here is my 2 cents for whats its worth. Why should I care what others do or even have the nerve to tell them what to do? How does that affect me at all?
You know what I want the legislators to work on? Bills that mean something such as education funding, the environment, healthcare, crime. Lets take care of the real important issues here. Imagine doing that! If they spent half their energy on some of those issues rather than this nonsense then maybe they could get something accomplished for the people of Maryland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my 2 cents for whats its worth. Why should I care what others do or even have the nerve to tell them what to do? How does that affect me at all?<br />
You know what I want the legislators to work on? Bills that mean something such as education funding, the environment, healthcare, crime. Lets take care of the real important issues here. Imagine doing that! If they spent half their energy on some of those issues rather than this nonsense then maybe they could get something accomplished for the people of Maryland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Bittner</title>
		<link>http://harfordrepublican.com/gay-marriage-in-maryland/comment-page-1/#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Bittner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harfordrepublican.com/?p=170#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how the gay marriage &quot;debate&quot; is a &quot;hardcore liberal&quot; full court press.  Gay marriage is currently not legal in Maryland.  As far as I know, there is no bill under consideration to make gay marriage legal in Maryland.  SB 564 and HB 919 are unnecessary conservative attempts to define marriage while there is no serious debate about making any changes.  They are, in my opinion, discriminatory, unfair and unneeded.

HB 919, the Maryland Marriage Protection Act, is going before a House committee next week.  I am going down to Annapolis to testify against the bill.  I don&#039;t think I understand conservative arguments against gay marriage and I&#039;d like to learn more.  I&#039;m sure there&#039;s some people on this site who are willing to learn me on why marriage should only be between a man and a woman.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how the <acronym title="gay">***</acronym> marriage &#8220;debate&#8221; is a &#8220;hardcore liberal&#8221; full court press.  <acronym title="Gay">***</acronym> marriage is currently not legal in Maryland.  As far as I know, there is no bill under consideration to make <acronym title="gay">***</acronym> marriage legal in Maryland.  SB 564 and HB 919 are unnecessary conservative attempts to define marriage while there is no serious debate about making any changes.  They are, in my opinion, discriminatory, unfair and unneeded.</p>
<p>HB 919, the Maryland Marriage Protection Act, is going before a House committee next week.  I am going down to Annapolis to testify against the bill.  I don&#8217;t think I understand conservative arguments against <acronym title="gay">***</acronym> marriage and I&#8217;d like to learn more.  I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s some people on this site who are willing to learn me on why marriage should only be between a man and a woman.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
